The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing, it is recognized that the Defendant’s mistake and reflects the fact that the value of the stolen object is less than 10,00 won, and that the Defendant does not want the Defendant’s punishment by providing 20,000 won to the victim, and that the Defendant continues to observe the cryp surgery in 2012, and that it should take into account the equity between the case of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes). However, the Defendant committed the thief crime of this case on February 15, 2013 at the same time, the Defendant committed the thief crime of this case on several occasions, and the Defendant, other than the Defendant, has been punished by imprisonment due to the Defendant’s age, character and family environment, motive, motive leading leading to the instant crime, method and consequence of imprisonment.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to do so. It is so decided as per Disposition.