Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, B, and C knew that the victim D's intellectual ability was lower than that of the general public, and knew that the victim D was defective in the same business as the vehicle loan business, and used the Handphone, the general telephone opening, the Internet application, and the loan in the victim's name.

1. Around September 15, 201, the Defendant and B, even though using a Handphone in the FHandphone sales store located in Hongjin-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City, the Defendant and B did not intend or have ability to pay the cost thereof, the Defendant and the Defendant, despite the absence of intent or ability to pay the cost thereof, concluded that D “on the face of opening the handphone in four names, the Defendant would pay the cost thereof in full.” The Defendant and the Defendant had the victim open the 2 unit (G and H) mobile phone for the SK Telecom, including the mechanical value, and did not pay 2,437,800 won, and acquired the pecuniary benefit equivalent to the said amount.

2. On September 21, 201, the Defendant and B: (a) falsely called the victim D that “on the face of opening a Hand phone in the name of D even if the Defendant and B got a Hand phone from the J-Hand phone sales store located in the Young-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the cost of the use thereof; (b) provided that “on the face of opening the Hand phone in the four names, the Defendant would pay the cost of the use in full”; and (c) provided the victim with the two mobile phones (K and L), and used it, did not pay 1,059,260 won including the mechanical value, thereby obtaining the pecuniary benefit equivalent to the said amount.

3. On September 16, 201, the Defendant, C, and B told the victim D at a Korean bank located in Gyeongwon-dong, Jeoncheon-gu, Jeoncheon-gu, Jeoncheon-gu, Seoul, that “I would obtain a loan in the name of the victim as it is necessary to operate the business, and would make the loan in the name of the victim.” The Defendant, C, and B received five million won from the victim who received a loan in the name of the victim from the Solomon Savings Bank.”

4. At around 02:00 on October 14, 201, the Defendant sent the victim D a bridge, shoulder, etc. to the victim D within the 501 Nururel located in Seo-jin-gu M, Seojin-gu, Seoul.