The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

A. Although the defendant asked T or U to cause mistake of facts, the defendant did not allow all the customers who had been on the Snono-ju shop operated by the defendant to have been in the actual helper because they did not arrive until they were abandoned.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 80 hours of community service) is too unreasonable.

The summary of the facts charged against the defendant is a person who operates Snoz points, which is a juvenile harmful business establishment, in the RR underground in 1,00.

Although the owner of a business establishment harmful to juveniles is not allowed to employ a juvenile, the defendant employed the juvenile as a entertainment loan from the above Snonok's store around October 1, 2012 at around 23:10 to the above Snok's store.

B. On October 1, 2012, no one had a juvenile drink with a customer, provide a customer with an entertainment by singing or dancing, or arrange or arrange such an act. However, on October 1, 2012, the defendant had a juvenile T-person (the age of 14), U (the age of 14), and U (the age of 14) provide a customer with an entertainment with his/her name-free customer by drinking, singing, or dancing.

The Defendant alleged not guilty in the lower court’s judgment to the same effect as the grounds for appeal, but the lower court stated to the effect that: (a) under the following circumstances, i.e., the Defendant was consistently informed by the evidence adopted by the investigation agency from the investigation agency to the court of the lower court, T did work with U and received expenses; (b) there is no reason to reject the credibility of the Defendant’s statement in light of T’s attitude of the statement in the court of the lower court; and (c) Q and Q stated in the investigative agency and the court of the lower court to the effect that T and U were entered in the Defendant’s Snok points; and (c) Y.