Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 800,00, and by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 5, 2015, Defendant A appeared as a witness in the case of violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (Unlawful Medical Operator) at the Busan District Court No. 301, Jan. 5, 2015, and testified as follows after taking an oath.

Public prosecutor: The witness can lend money to C.

Defendant

A:

A. Prosecutor: need to lend money due to C’s failure to do so.

Defendant

A: He/she needs to do so and he/she will lend money to the hospital while he/she will work at the hospital.

Therefore, it is necessary to lend the 170 lending month to the author, and there is only 1.65 million won to the author, and even if so, it is required to lend it to the author.

It is reasonable for a prosecutor to lend money to 1650,000 won.

1650,000 won is loaned.

Defendant

A:

E. Prosecutor: On April 2014, 2014, after being aware of the fact that C had received catheric production procedures from B.

Defendant

A: I shall not:

According to the C’s statement, the prosecutor: (a) carried the tools manufacturing B’s mold with C’s house, leaving C’s house to manufacture the mold; (b) has been holding C’s house after one week; and (c) is aware of such fact.

Defendant

A: Not required.

Prosecutor: Is there is no prosecutor.

It can be said that there is no knowledge of such fact.

Defendant

A: There is no such fact.

How we have no machinery can be combined.

Prosecutor: However, there is no fact with a thickness;

It is essential to presume that there is no construction section because there is no construction section.

Defendant

A: Not required.

It is necessary to do so.

It is why we can see why we can see it.

However, at the time of the aforementioned testimony, Defendant A received a request from C for refund of the price for dice production procedure conducted by B on June 27, 2014 and returned 1.650,000 won directly to C, and Defendant A did not lend 1.650,000 won to C and B on April 2014.