beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than 6 months and for not less than 2 (b) of the holding.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A On June 24, 2011, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Seoul Southern District Court for a period of one year and six months and two years of suspension of execution, and on December 16, 2011, the said judgment becomes final and conclusive and is currently in the grace period.
The Defendants were to provide loans to the victims after raising credit rating by opening their cell phone numbers in a virtual manner, and falsely concluding that the victims’ identity cards and contact numbers are received from the victims, and the Defendants sent their identification cards and contact numbers to the aforementioned E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, etc., and the aforementioned E, etc. were sent to the mobile phone agency, and the Defendants conspired in order to have the rebates and the mobile phone terminal devices delivered from the agency divided, by sending the victims’ identification cards and contact numbers.
1. On August 4, 2011, Defendant A: (a) at the O mobile phone sales store operated by the Defendant of the 8th floor of Yongsan-gu Seoul National Building; (b) at the telephone sales store operated by the Defendant of Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul; (c) after lending the victim P with the victim’s mobile phone opening a virtual phone to increase credit rating; (d) falsely stating that the victim P will impair or terminate the change of the name within three months; and (e) the victim’s identification card and contact number from the victim, the victim’s identification card and contact number were collected from the said telemater, and (e) sent the victim’s mobile phone to Q, an agent of the mobile phone, to open the mobile phone under the victim’s name.
However, in fact, there is no intention or ability to make a loan by raising the credit rating of the victim, and the above mobile phone was actually opened and disposed of by transferring the opened mobile phone to a third party, so there was no intention or ability to harm the change of name or terminate it within three months.
The defendant, in collusion with E and F, induces the victim as such.