1. All incidental appeals relating to the plaintiff's principal lawsuit and the defendant's counterclaim are dismissed.

2. Appeal and.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, except for addition to the part corresponding to the judgment of the court of first instance as to the defendant’s counterclaim claim, since the following additional determination is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The defendant's argument on the plaintiff's assertion that the contract of this case was terminated after the plaintiff's marriage had been married. According to the standard terms and conditions for international marriage brokerage, in such a case, only 10% of the remainder after deducting 90% of the expenses that the marriage brokerage company received from its members should be refunded to its members. The defendant asserts that the non-paid 2.5 million won (13,500,000 won - the defendant received 13.5 million won) and damages for delay should be paid.

According to the purport of the argument as a whole in the statement No. 1 of this case, when according to the standard terms and conditions of international marriage brokerage that the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to include in the terms and conditions of the contract, if the mediation agreement is terminated after marriage is married, the broker shall deduct an amount equivalent to 90% of the total expenses of brokerage from the penalty and return the remaining amount to the members.

However, this is merely a provision on the restitution in case a member pays brokerage fees to a broker, and it cannot be deemed that the plaintiff's obligation to pay brokerage fees to the defendant based on the above standard terms and conditions. Therefore, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's main claim and the defendant's counterclaim are all dismissed, as they are without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's incidental appeal as to the main claim and counterclaim is all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.