logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.04.26 2015나36611
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the results of the fact inquiry by the court of first instance to the Busan Urban Police Station and the whole purport of pleadings.

The Plaintiff is a person entrusted by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport with the authority to guarantee motor vehicle accident compensation business that compensates the victim for losses within the scope of liability insurance when the victim dies or is injured due to the operation of a motor vehicle not covered by liability insurance or liability mutual aid under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act. The Defendant is a holder of B cargo vehicles (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

B. On October 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven the instant vehicle on October 16, 2016:40; and (b) proceeded in the direction of the direction of the west-gu (hereinafter “Seoul-gu Sagle”) along the direction of the intersection, sent on the first line of the vehicle in order to make a shift in the direction of the west-gu (hereinafter “Seoul-gu Sagle”); and (c) had a U-Saton in turn depending on the atmosphere of the vehicles sent earlier to the U-Saton signals; and (d) there was a collision between DOtoba and four-lane (5-lane roads) along which C driven by the direction of the intersection in the direction of the direction of the intersection.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). At the time, the instant vehicle did not subscribe to liability insurance.

C. According to the instant accident, C was injured by two frameworks, etc. requiring approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, and the Plaintiff paid C the total amount of compensation KRW 2,892,190 as medical expenses, as prescribed by the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Defendant asserted that the instant accident occurred due to the negligence of the U.S., failing to discover the ozone part of C, which was bypassing from the long distance of Seodaemun-gu, and due to the negligence of the U.S., C.

arrow