A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C are women of 2006, who are called as the believers and son and have a friendly relationship from 2006.

1. On April 15, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s home located in Sinpo-si No. 101 Dong 202, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Mapo-si, stating that “The Defendant borrowed KRW 30 million as he/she is urgently required to pay the money at present.” The Defendant borrowed money from the victim’s home.

At the time, the Defendant was unable to pay the credit card price under the name of the Defendant because of a large amount of monthly income, and was unable to pay the credit card price by using the credit card loan loan loan loan loan loan, etc., not only was the Defendant’s name but also the Defendant’s credit card is used in the name of the Defendant and was prevented from returning the credit card as above, and eventually, the credit card price and the credit card loan that have not been repaid and the credit card loan that have not been repaid amounted to KRW 20 million have reached the status of suspending the use of the credit card. However, there was no intention or ability to pay the borrowed amount even if receiving the money from the

On April 18, 2008, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received transfer of KRW 27 million from the victim’s account under the name of the Defendant on April 18, 2008; and (c) received remittance of KRW 2.5 million from the same account on April 23, 2008.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property from the victim by deceiving the victim.

2. On September 21, 201, the Defendant concluded that “Around September 21, 201, the Defendant would sell a single land purchased in the name of male and female and repay all the same to the money borrowed in a lump sum to the victim’s residence.”

However, the defendant did not purchase land in the name of male and female, and the defendant did not have obtained consent from E to repay the full amount of the borrowed money to the victim with the proceeds from the sale of the land in the name of male and female, and even if he received money from the injured party, he would have to pay the borrowed money.