1. The plaintiff's rehabilitation obligor's rehabilitation claim against a construction company with gender-friendly comprehensive shall be confirmed as KRW 286,173,889;

2...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 4, 2009, the Plaintiff and the Debtor Rehabilitation and Debtor Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Sacheon-si Construction”) concluded a subcontract for reinforced concrete construction (the second unit) among the apartment construction works of Dasan-dong, Seocheon-dong, 2009, among the apartment construction works of Dasan-dong, the construction works of reinforced concrete (the first unit), January 29, 2010, among the apartment construction works of the Han River, and the construction works of the Han River New-ro, Han River, and the construction works of reinforced concrete (the second unit) among the construction works of Dasan-dong, Seocheon-dong, 2013. The Plaintiff completed the execution of the construction works under the said subcontract.

B. The construction of Sung-friendly General Construction paid the Plaintiff the construction cost of each of the above subcontracts as a bill, and the payment of the bill discount for the number of delayed days is made upon the expiration of the maturity of the bill.

Due to the delay in the settlement of bills from August 10, 2010 to the date of the closing of the argument in this case, bill discount was issued for the total of KRW 286,173,889.

C. On December 24, 2014, rehabilitation procedures began on December 24, 2014 by Seoul Central District Court 2014 Gohap100184, and the Defendant was appointed as a manager of the gender-friendly comprehensive construction.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 8 (including, if any, various numbers) and the purport of the whole pleading

2. According to the above findings of the determination, since Seongdong General Construction is obligated to pay discount charge 286,173,889 won to the Plaintiff, it is confirmed that the Plaintiff’s rehabilitation claim for Seongdong General Construction is KRW 286,173,889.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.