logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.04.01 2015고단357
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 14, 2015, at around 00:25, the Defendants assaulted each other by disputing D’s house, which is the seat of the Defendants in Ansan-si on January 14, 2015.

112 A fighting match from F, who was dispatched to the E District of the Ansan Police Station E District of the Ansan Police Station after receiving a report, the Defendant A was able to take the right eyebrow part of the F at once a week, and Defendant B obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reports by 112, considering that Defendant B was able to take the right eye part of the F at hand with the right eye part of the F at hand, and that Defendant B was able to take the part of the F at hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are shown to have led to confession and reflect on the instant crime, and the circumstances leading to the instant crime are deemed to have committed the instant crime by contingently against the police officers called up during the marriage in the house, and Defendant B attempted to acquire the current Chinese nationality in the future (or, on the contrary, Defendant A entered the country around 2005 and obtained Korean nationality at the present time). If Defendant B is sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor or more due to the instant crime, it would be likely to suffer significant disadvantage in the future in the process of acquiring Korean nationality; Defendant A deposited KRW 700,000 to the victim after the instant indictment; Defendant A deposited the Defendant 70,000,000 to the Defendant; the Defendants did not have any past record of committing the instant crime; and the Defendants’ age, occupation, family relationship, economic situation, etc. shall be determined by taking into account the two circumstances as ordered by the Disposition.

arrow