logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.11.21 2019고단1212
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:00 on July 20, 2019, the Defendant driven a DNA spke vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.219% at a distance of about 11km from Pyeongtaek-si cafeteria to the same city from around 00:01 on July 20, 2019.

2. On July 20, 2019, the Defendant was in violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) around 09:30 on July 20, 201, and around 00:01 on July 20, 2019, the Defendant was under the control of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) as prescribed in paragraph (1).

At around 09:30 on July 20, 2019, the Defendant driven D SP vehicle while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.064% from around 3.7 km to E from around 09:30 to the front of the same city.

As a result, the Defendant violated the regulations on the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Notification of the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and a written appraisal of blood alcohol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting the circumstances of running a driving house;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (3) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “the Criminal Procedure Act”) under Article 334(1) and the fact that the Defendant has no criminal history.

arrow