Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who engages in a building business.

1. On October 03, 201, the Defendant: (a) stated that the standard subcontract agreement for construction works related to B apartment bed and waterproof construction works is commenced on or before October 03, 201 and completed until August 31, 2011 in the contract form for B apartment bed and constructed on or after the commencement of construction works related to the construction works related to the construction of B apartment bed and waterproof construction at the office of Hong-gun Hong-gun Construction Site; and (b) stated that “C, representative director D, and Chungcheong-gun E” was affixed to the principal contractor column and affixed C’s corporate director who was in possession of C Company D’s name and affixed the standard subcontract form under C’s name, which is a private document related to rights and duties to exercise; (c) the Defendant, at the site of the foregoing investigation document, forged the standard subcontract form for construction works to be executed on or after the completion of construction works to GF’s representative director, who is aware of the forgery.

It is intended to pay the amount of money according to the contract deposit of KRW 94,00,000 (value-added tax) and the rate of advance payment of construction work after completing the construction of B apartment not, landscaping and waterproof construction from March 03, 208 to October 31, 2011, and completing the construction from August 31, 201.

“....”

On October 03, 2011, the victim believed this, prepared a standard subcontract agreement for construction works at the construction site office of Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongdong.

However, the Defendant did not operate a comprehensive construction company under the trade name of C Co., Ltd. and did not have the ability to pay the down payment even if the construction is completed.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, did not pay KRW 9,350,000 for the first construction cost, such as the female hosting work and underground opening work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. G.