logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.11.08 2018고단4230
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On August 8, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car on the 15:25th day of August, 2018, and proceeded along the four-lanes in front of the direction of the direction of the direction of the suk-gu, Daegu along the four-lanes in the direction of the spuk-gu, Nam-gu, Daegu, with four-lanes in the direction of the spuk-gu.

Since a crosswalk with signal lights is installed, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving service is a person to wear a crosswalk by reducing speed and complying with signal signals, and to safely operate the crosswalk.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to discover the victim C (79 tax) and the victim D (80 tax) who cross the crosswalk in the front line from the right side to the left side in accordance with the pedestrian signals, and did not discover the victim C (79 tax) and the victim D (80 tax). After driving the above vehicle, the Defendant got the victim C and got the victim D into the front side of the above vehicle, and got the victim D to be sealed.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as a brush of the right-hand part, which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim D, such as crut salt, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. C’s statement;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: The victims’ injury is recognized and reflected in the circumstances that are favorable to that of the victims: The fact that vehicles are covered by comprehensive insurance, and that the victims and victims have agreed to do so.

arrow