A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 14, 2018, at around 11:50, the Defendant received a request from E (E) who is an employee, to “bruptly changed” that “I am under the influence of alcohol,” and “I see that I am under the influence of alcohol,” “I am under the influence of alcohol,” and “I am under the influence of I am under the influence of alcohol,” “I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I

The question is whether it is a ppuri, and it is only a question.

( 완료, 의문), 뿟 다( 과거 완료). 네 갈 길이나 가라!

“Until 13:20 on the same day, the victim’s restaurant business was obstructed by not later than 13:30 minutes and not more than 13:20 on the same day, such as taking a bath, etc., and having other customers go out without completing meals.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol with respect to E;

1. Application of the investigation report (1) and each photograph/cinematographic output statute;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 of the option of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order [the scope of recommendation] The basic area (six months to one year and six months) within the scope of the sentence according to the sentencing guidelines (the decision of sentence], and there are very many criminal records of violence, and there are very high possibility of recidivism as the previous records of business obstruction continue to exist since 2016, and considerable damages are likely to occur due to considerable length of business obstruction. Nevertheless, there are no lights that make efforts to recover victims from damage caused by the crime of this case, such as compensating the defendant for damage, and that the words against E can be seen as a crime of intimidation or insult, while there are no criminal records of interference with the same kind of business beyond the fine.