logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2016.04.06 2015가단7891
제3자이의
Text

1. Certificate No. 1501 prepared by the Defendant on September 26, 2014 by a notary public against the diesel Global Co., Ltd. by the law firm C.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. Since the articles in the separate sheet stating the purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion are owned by the Plaintiff, the Defendant cannot enforce compulsory execution against the above articles based on the enforcement title against the diesel Global Co., Ltd.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the written evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as well as the fact-finding results of the Gwangju District Court’s Manpoon, the Defendant’s compulsory execution against the goods indicated in the separate sheet should be denied, since the goods listed in the separate sheet are recognized as owned by

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is justified.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow