Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case after dismissal as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[Completioned Parts]
A. The part of the second page 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, i.e., “issued and delivered.” was issued and delivered, and the part of the promissory note of this case is written with the statement of exemption from drawing up the protest.”
B. The part of the Promissory Notes Nos. 4, 5, 14, 4, 2, 17, 19, 5, 3, 6, 8, and 11, 3, 4, 5, 5, 3, 6, 8, and 11, 3, 4, 5, 4, and 4
C. If the Defendant deducts KRW 15,043,952 from KRW 93,38,109,187, - KRW 90,817,637, - KRW 15,629,57, equivalent to the amount of the advance payment that the Defendant paid to A from KRW 158,109,187, - KRW 157,000 from the service cost that the Defendant paid to A; KRW 145,629,57; and KRW 15,043,952 from the defect in the painting of the delivered goods, the Defendant would rather be entitled to return KRW 158,109,187, - KRW 90,817,637, - KRW 145,629,57, - KRW 15,043,952.
Therefore, the Defendant has become not liable to pay the Promissory Notes in full by paying the service cost to A.
2. The plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.