logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.04.22 2014고단8527
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 1, 2014, at around 00:10, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the victim D (here, 41 years old) who is the wife of the Defendant in his/her residence in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, would disregard himself/herself; and (b) on the floor of his/her hand, the victim’s face could not be known to the victim, resulting in injury, such as impairment of the face of the victim’s face.

2. Around November 23, 2014, the Defendant expressed that “I am her only because I am her, I am her, I am her to her, I am her to her, I am her to her. I am her to her. I am her to her. I am her to her. I am her to her. I am her to her. I am her to her. I am her to her. I her to her to her. I am her to her to her. if I she was divorced at this time, I she her to her to her.” The Defendant she saw the victim’s defect that I she was her to her at the end of her horse and her to her to her to her. I am her to her. I her to her to her to her.

Summary of Evidence

1. The part concerning the first crime in the defendant's legal statement

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Application of statutes to certificates of medical records, certificates of rescue and emergency medical services;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of injury, the point of injury, and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., repeated consideration), the Defendant asserted that the crime No. 2, as indicated in the judgment, was committed by using the kitchen knife, and that there was no threat. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court

arrow