The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the punishment (the completion of sexual assault treatment programs for eight months and forty hours) of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the aforementioned favorable sentencing grounds, including the following: (a) the Defendant’s confession of a crime, the Defendant’s confession of a crime, and the agreement with some victims; (b) there are many criminal convictions and sentence having been sentenced several times; (c) the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the suspended execution period; and (d) the Defendant’s age, family relationship, economic situation, developments and motive leading to the instant crime; and (b) other matters concerning the sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments on changes in the records of the instant case, the lower judgment’s punishment is deemed reasonable; and (d) there is no change in circumstances to be any additional consideration in the trial of the lower court.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit and is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and is so decided as per Disposition (i.e., a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes when the crime of indecent conduct in the judgment below, which is a sex offense subject to registration of new information, becomes final and conclusive, the Defendant becomes a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the same Act, and has the duty to submit personal information to the competent authority pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act. In full view of the statutory punishment, nature of each of the instant crimes, criminal facts, and the circumstances leading to the aggravation of concurrent crimes, the lower court’s judgment that did not deem that