1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff, a national of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "China"), filed a marriage report with B, who is a national of the Republic of Korea on March 20, 2007, and obtained the status of stay on June 25, 2007 [the spouse of the citizen shall be granted the status of stay (title F-2) before the amendment by Presidential Decree No. 23274 on November 1, 201, and the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act was enforced on December 15, 2011, while the above Enforcement Decree was amended as above, the spouse of the citizen shall obtain the status of stay (title F-6).]

On August 22, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against B seeking a divorce, etc. on the ground that B had frequently stuffed and independently fightd with the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff as an economic problem (U.S. District Court Decision 2013Ddan9742). On November 12, 2013, the Plaintiff and B divorced by the judgment of the following: (a) on November 12, 2013, the Plaintiff appeared in the court and stated that B was erroneous in the failure in the marriage; and (b) on November 12, 2013, the Plaintiff and B were divorced.

On April 22, 2014, the Plaintiff applied to the Defendant for the extension of the period of stay as the status of stay for marriage immigrants (F-6).

However, on June 27, 2014, the Defendant rejected the extension of the period of stay on the grounds of “the lack of authenticity of the marriage and the uncertainty of the cause attributable to the former spouse” and the Defendant cited “other grounds” as the disposition grounds other than “the lack of authenticity of the marriage and the uncertainty of the cause attributable to the spouse” in the instant disposition document (Evidence A6). However, in light of the developments leading up to the instant disposition, the Defendant’s assertion and the evidence submitted by the original Defendant in the instant case, the Defendant’s “the lack of authenticity of the marriage and the uncertainty of the cause attributable to the spouse” as the grounds for the instant disposition.

I would like to say.

The following is determined on the premise that “the lack of authenticity of the marriage and the uncertainty of the cause attributable to the spouse” is the cause of the disposition of this case.

By July 11, 2014.