logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.05.30 2013고정986
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 6, 2012, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on November 6, 2012, as the title, “F reconstruction apartment partnership head,” with a view to slandering the victim E at the Internet’s bulletin board, such as newspaper articles, etc., as follows:

It is necessary to establish a deep audit on the foundation of the press organization which makes efforts to realize the stability and justice of the country and to realize the justice.

Now, I would like to locked the wind of reconstruction related speculation in Gangnam, which is recently unfolded in the past, and at the same time, I would like to inform the public of the corruption of the head of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F reconstruction Association, which is a specimen of the corruption of the head of the reconstruction association that is bound by our society.

The head of the F reconstruction Association E has resided in 6,205 Dong apartment complex and has been working as the head of the reconstruction association since the last 1989.

Unlike the selection of construction works in G in the past year, F had already been selected by an individual in H, I and secret interest around 1992.

In return for this, E would have additionally purchased three bonds in addition to the shares in the 6.205 same 205 that it holds in case of the reconstruction of apartment and the bribe of 3 billion won as activity expenses.

If 40 square meters are reconstructed at the present market price, the value will be below one billion won, so the president of the partnership has the ability to gain approximately 6 billion won, along with the bribe of 3 billion won already received.

Of course, this bribe paid by a construction company to E is natural that other partners have to accept the value on behalf of them.

In the process of the selection of the contractor, there was no consent and participation of the union members.

It has been thoroughly excluded from the opinion of apartment residents because there is no participation in the opinion.

In order to avoid large amount of deposits and traceability, E who does not have a certain occupation from the ordinary level of income, the bank account will be changed to the future children's bank account.

arrow