logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2016. 10. 13. 선고 2016가단21444 판결
사해행위취소[국승]
Title

Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Summary

The transfer transaction of this case is subject to the cancellation of fraudulent act due to the bad faith and excess of the debt of the defaulted taxpayer.

Related statutes

Article 406 of the Civil Act

Cases

Daejeon District Court Branch 2016 Ghana 21444 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Plaintiff and appellant

- Appellants

M

Defendant, Appellant and Appellant

AA

Judgment of the first instance court

National Rotations

Conclusion of Pleadings

August 26, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

o October 13, 2016

Text

1. As to the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached list of real estate between Defendant AA and Nonparty BB

The sales contract concluded on October 16, 2013 shall be revoked.

2. As to the real estate listed in paragraph 1 of the attached list of real estate by Defendant AA to Nonparty BB

The registration of ownership transfer completed on November 19, 2013 with the receipt of No. 29393, such as the official branch court of the Daejeon District Court

shall comply with the procedure for the registration of cancellation.

3. As to the real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached list of real estate between Defendant AA and Nonparty BB

The reservation to trade concluded on November 8, 2013 and the sales contract concluded on July 8, 2015 shall be revoked, respectively.

4. As to the real estate listed in paragraph 2 of the attached list of real estate by Defendant AA to Nonparty BB

The request for transfer of ownership completed with No. 29392, Nov. 19, 2013, including the official branch court of the Daejeon District Court

The provisional registration of right and the transfer of ownership completed under No. 18042 on July 13, 2015 by the same registry office

Each cancellation registration procedure shall be implemented.

5. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Cheong-gu Office

The same shall apply to the order.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 208 (3) 1 and Article 257 of the Civil Procedure Act;

arrow