1. The Defendant’s KRW 27,672,00 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from September 1, 2013 to October 13, 2014.

1. The Plaintiff’s determination as to the cause of the claim is engaged in the sales business of pesticides, seedlings, etc. under the trade name of C. The Plaintiff continued to supply pesticides, etc. to the Defendant from around 2012, and agreed to be paid the price as at the end of the following month from the date of supply. The Defendant confirmed on July 16, 2013 that the price for agrochemicals, etc. not paid up to the time to the Plaintiff was KRW 27,402,00, and confirmed that the price for agrochemicals, etc. not paid up to the time to the Plaintiff was KRW 27,402,00. The Plaintiff’s additional supply of commodities equivalent to KRW 270,00 to the Defendant on July 16, 2013 does not conflict between the parties,

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 27,672,00 won (=27,402,000 won) and damages for delay at each rate of 20% per annum under the Commercial Act from September 1, 2013 to October 13, 2014, which is the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case, as claimed by the plaintiff, after the end of the following month from the supply date of the plaintiff's agricultural chemicals, etc. (i.e., 27,402,00 won) and after the end of the following month from the supply date of the plaintiff's agricultural chemicals, etc.

2. The defendant's assertion argues that the defendant could not respond to the plaintiff's request because the defendant suffered loss due to blight due to agrochemicals supplied by the plaintiff.

However, there is no evidence to prove that the agrochemicals supplied by the plaintiff were sick by the defendant, and the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.