logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.11.17 2015가합23557
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are the parents of Nonparty E, and the Defendants are the owners of three-story detached houses of reinforced concrete structure (refinite concrete roof) in Seocho-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoju-si (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. The Defendants leased 203 units of the instant building KRW 1,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 260,000, and the lease period from March 1, 2015 to March 1, 2016, and thereafter, were residing in the instant building.

C. On September 8, 2015, around 18:42, a fire occurred in the instant building No. 103 (hereinafter “instant fire”), and the said E died on September 9, 2015, while being sent back to an emergency room of the hospital of the Chungcheong University due to the inhalement of toxic gas due to fire, and was receiving treatment.

(hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”). D.

The building 103 of this case was air conditioners installed at the expense of the Defendants and provided to the lessee. However, with respect to the point and causes of the fire of this case, the National Scientific Investigation Institute determined that “the inside of the fire site, 103, is likely to have been emitted early in the air conditioners installed in the room, considering the electrical characteristics identified in the burning, cooling, and cooling,” and that “the condition of distinguishing the falltains from many inside wires installed at the bottom of the cooling, there is a possibility of causing damage to the internal wire, and that the limitation on the falls of the internal wire, which function as a direct cause of combustion, is impossible.” The North Western Fire Station presumed to be “the mechanical factors, such as the heating of the air condition in the combustion area, the heating of the air condition in the combustion area, and the heating.”

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, the result of the commission of document forwarding to the Seoul Central District Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion is that the fire of this case is below 103 air conditioners owned by the defendants, which were provided as options.

arrow