Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

A. On February 6, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (C) (C) was a person driving a BKan-F car. On February 6, 2013, the Defendant 201:36, driving the said car on the upper right side of the Hen-Jin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (C) and driving the said car on the upper right side of the Hen-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (C) and driving it on the right side of the C while changing the course from the An-Jin-gu road surface to the Man-gu distance shooting.

When any person is killed or injured or any goods are damaged by traffic, such as driving of any motor vehicle, the driver of the relevant motor vehicle shall immediately stop the motor vehicle and take necessary measures to provide assistance to casualties.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not take necessary measures to eliminate traffic obstruction and danger, even though the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle by the foregoing accident to cover KRW 3,777,620.

B. The defendant is in violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

While under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.141% at a temporary border, the above car was driven by approximately 300 meters from the old Sokdong-gu, Seogjin-gu, Seogjin-gu, Seoul to the front day of the 202-dong-dong-dong-dong, Seogjin-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A traffic accident report, on-site inspection report, and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on detection of a host driver;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201)

1. Articles 70 and 69 of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.