1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. At the same time, 75,000,000 won is paid from the Plaintiff, the buildings listed in the attached Table.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff was leased the instant building owned by the Vindication-gun (competent District Agricultural Technology Center) from the Vindication-gun (competent District Agricultural Technology Center).

B. Around September to October 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to lease the instant building with a fixed term of KRW 100,000,000 for lease deposit and KRW 5,500,000 for the following month (hereinafter “instant lease contract”) (around May 2015, the rent actually received after the change of KRW 5,00,000 for KRW 5,000 for each month) and from December 1, 2014 to December 2016 for lease (hereinafter “instant lease contract”).

C. The Defendant paid KRW 100,000,000 to the Plaintiff, and occupied and used the instant building by receiving delivery from the Plaintiff.

On June 3, 2016 and October 17, 2016, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a content-certified mail stating that “The contract term with the Vindication-gun is anticipated to be terminated on or around October 2016, and the instant lease contract will be terminated on or around October 2016, the Plaintiff sent to the Plaintiff a content-certified mail containing the following: (a) it is anticipated that the contract term with the Vindication-gun will be terminated; and (b) it is anticipated that the contract termination will be terminated on or after the expiration of the lease term; and (c) it

E. The loan agreement between the Plaintiff and the Vindication-gun regarding the instant building was terminated on November 1, 2016.

The Defendant continues to occupy and use the instant building from November 1, 2016 to the date, and did not pay the Plaintiff the rent from June 1, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the request for delivery of a building

A. According to the above findings of the determination on the cause of the claim, the instant lease contract was terminated on November 1, 2016, and thus, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant, a lessee, is obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff, a lessor, to its original state.

B. The first defendant's assertion regarding the defendant's defense (1) and the loan agreement between the plaintiff and the pool-gun.