logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.08.14 2013가단236566
기타(금전)
Text

1. The defendant shall pay 73,500,000 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from February 2, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. B, as a licensed real estate agent, operated the D Licensed Real Estate Agent Office in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, and E, at the office of the said licensed real estate agent, performed business related to the brokerage of real estate in B.

B. On December 7, 2010, B entered into a mutual aid agreement between the Defendant and the Defendant with the content that guarantees B’s liability for damages to a transaction party at the time of causing property damage due to intention or negligence in performing real estate brokerage pursuant to the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act (hereinafter “Act”).

C. E and B shall receive a loan, purchase F C 301 F C 301 (the instant real estate) in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, and then sell it again and make profits if any. B shall receive a loan from the original credit cooperative as collateral and complete the registration of ownership transfer for the instant real estate.

E introduced the instant real estate at the office of the said D Licensed Real Estate Agent on June 7, 201, to the Plaintiff seeking a deposit of the instant real estate at the office of the said D Licensed Real Estate Agent, and concluded that “The instant real estate is owned by a licensed real estate agent B, and thus, is believedable.” Although the instant real estate has a right to lease on a deposit basis with the maximum debt amount of KRW 158,000,000 and a right to lease on a deposit basis for lease on a deposit basis, the right to lease on a deposit basis remains more than KRW 70,00,000 with the repayment of the debt with the deposit of the deposit, and the right to lease on a deposit basis is not known to the effect that it is not

However, in fact, E did not have any intention or ability to repay the collateral security debt established on the above real estate, since E was willing to use the deposit for purchase of the above real estate and repayment of the debt even if it was delivered by the Plaintiff.

Nevertheless, E induces the plaintiff and caused the plaintiff to do so.

arrow