The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. On the other hand, the lower court sentenced two years of imprisonment, considering the jury’s sentencing opinion (one year and two years of imprisonment, two years of imprisonment, one year and two years of imprisonment, one year and one year of imprisonment, one year and one year of imprisonment), taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant committed repeatedly the same thief of the same content in a short time without being during the period of repeated offense; (b) the confession and reflect of the Defendant; and (c) the amount of damage in favor of him.

In light of the records, considering all of the circumstances cited in the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is not unfairly harsh, even if the circumstances cited in the grounds of appeal are considered, given that the aforementioned circumstances and other conditions of sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, health conditions, the circumstances after the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

3. The defendant's ground of appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.