1. Of the real estate listed in the annex list:

A. Defendant D is Daegu District Court with respect to the share of 20/75 to Defendant E.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant E, around January 1, 2001, leased approximately 200 m200 m2 from the net F (Death on September 21, 2003) for the purpose of owning a building on the ground, for the purpose of owning approximately 866.1 m2 on the ground.

B. After the conclusion of the above lease contract, Defendant E obtained the approval for use by extending the 66 square meters of neighborhood living facilities (the 66 square meters of evidence A 1) existing on the above land, which had been constructed on the above land.

The above-mentioned building was extended to a Dong separate from the above existing building, and the building listed in the attached Table A (the building stated in the evidence A 1-1, hereinafter “instant building”) is included therein.

C. The deceased on September 21, 2003, and the above lease contract was implicitly renewed.

Defendant E, the heir of the deceased F on October 5, 2009, is from H, I, J, K, K, Plaintiff A, Defendant D, Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff C (hereinafter “the deceased’s heir”).

For the purpose of owning approximately 155 square meters among the land described in the port, the lease term was set from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014.

E. Defendant E requested renewal of the lease agreement to the deceased’s heir, but rejected it, and Defendant E sent a written complaint on the case No. 2014Gahap3471 to the above inheritor.

As to the existing building and the extended building mentioned in the paragraph, the right to demand purchase of the building was exercised.

F. The instant case was served on the Plaintiff A on December 15, 2014, Plaintiff B, and C on January 14, 2015.

G. As long as Defendant E exercises the right to purchase a building by serving a complaint in the case No. 2014Gahap3471, the deceased’s heir included the instant building to Defendant E as an indivisible obligation.

On October 8, 2015, on the ground that the market price of the existing building and the extended building described in the Paragraph are obligated to pay KRW 88,057,000,000 to each Defendant E.

The above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.