logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.11 2018고정2048
재물은닉
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 05:50 on July 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) tried to enter the victim E (57 years of age) to sell a D subdivision in front of C located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu; (b) caused damage to the victim’s shoulder by cutting the front string of the string and cutting the string of the string; and (c) caused damage to the 200,000 won at the market price by leaving the string of the 200,000 won; and (d) G6 of the market price to KRW 1 million at the 370,000,000,00 won at the 370,000,00 won at the market price by leaving the string of the string of the 200,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement of the victim;

1. The place of the crime and the report on occurrence of the crime;

1. Application of investigative reports (verification of whether damaged articles are recovered) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

3. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (Reasons for the crime of oil)

1. The main point of the argument is that the victim's fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting with the string of the string of the string, and then the fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting with the string of the police fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, i.e., (i) the victim went back to the door, not by the body, but by the body of the victim in this Court as to the situation where the string of the string in this Court was cut.

It seems that it is a sacrife that it would be ‘comford'.

arrow