logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.02.08 2015고정761
자유무역지역의지정및운영에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A corporation shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

Defendant

B 151,139,717 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who works in B, and is in charge of the business of carrying pelpellets in custody and shipping pelpelpellets in a mining range, and Defendant B is a corporation whose main business is the storage, shipping, and shipping of pelpellets pelpelpellets for fuel in a mining port imported from the import owner of the Mayang-si, Namyang-si, Seoul, with the delegation from the import owner.

Anyone who intends to import goods shall report to the head of a customs office the name, size, quantity and price of the relevant goods and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree.

1) Defendant A, by taking advantage of the fact that the imported cargo stored in a warehouse in a mining port free trade zone, is difficult to control and supervise the customs office, was sentenced to the direction of the representative director E of the corporation B to remove the pelpellets, whose taxes such as value and tax are not paid, prior to the import declaration.

On November 26, 2014, the Gwangju Port Co., Ltd. also carried 72,652,665 won (cost 48,895,244) of the market value of 72,665 won (cost 48,895,244) into a rode warehouse (B/L number F) into the 20th day of the same month, without filing a report with the head of Vietnam Sheet No. 278,90km, and continuously carried pelpelpellets into the same site on November 26, 2014 (B/L number G) without filing a report with the head of the customs office without permission, and brought 1,047,487,052 (cost 52,821,786 won) into the same site on November 26, 2014 (B/L number G) to the head of the customs office without permission.

On November 26, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Designation and Management of Free Trade Zones by shipping pellets 588,014g to the head of a customs office of Vietnam, equivalent to KRW 151,139,717 (cost 101,717,030) at the market price, without filing a declaration, etc.

2) Defendant B was an employee of Defendant A and violated the Act on Designation and Management of Free Trade Zones with respect to Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, E, and I;

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Statement made by the police to J or K;

1. The present status of delivery and inventory;

arrow