logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.09.12 2013고단3071
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a Hegel car.

On March 29, 2013, around 07:15, the Defendant came to proceed to the lower side of Daegu on the road located in the Cheongcheon-si, Cheongyang-si, Cheongyang-si.

There are two-lanes of duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the front vehicle by examining the front side and the right and the right of the person engaged in driving of the vehicle, and ensuring the safety distance of the front vehicle.

Nevertheless, when the defendant neglected to do so and proceeds in the same direction as the defendant, the defendant received the back part of the victim C(64 years old) 1 ton of the cargo vehicle from the victim C(64 years old) which was proceeding in the same direction as the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim C, such as catum salt in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and suffered injury on the victim E (V, 65 years of age) who was on board the cargo vehicle from the above catter for about six weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act at the same time and place as stated in paragraph (1) above, and at the same time and place, damaged the victim C driver’s above c driving vehicle by negligence to maintain the repair cost of KRW 421,835.

3. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant was driving a B Hegel car which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the date and place mentioned in the above Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 3(1) and (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts;

arrow