The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (ten years of imprisonment and two years of suspension of qualifications) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The following circumstances are established: (a) the Defendant, who escaped to North Korea under the control of an anti-government organization, and the act of meeting with its members, derived from the intent of the Defendant, i.e., the missionary work of Domination against North Korea, rather than for the purpose of benefiting North Korea’s public organization; (b) the victim I appears to have died without any resistance to the Defendant’s act of Domination “a thickness” and Domination; and (c) the Defendant’s act of Domination of Domination, which is the victim, is making a net confession of all criminal facts, and the mistake is divided.

However, even though the defendant knew that escape from North Korea and meetings with its members may cause danger to the national existence and security or free democratic fundamental order, the defendant attempted to visit North Korea for a considerable period of time prior to the crime of this case, such as finding the North Korean Embassy stationed in North Korea around early April 2006, and requested to visit North Korea, and eventually eventually resulted in the crime of this case. The defendant's relationship between the victim and the leader in charge of investigation in North Korea and brought about the defendant at the time of smuggling, and there is no doubt that it would be reasonable to bring about about 20,00 US dollars. The defendant kills the victim's title with the Hedra electric line, immediately after the defendant kills the victim, thereby causing danger to the national existence and security or democratic basic order. The defendant's act of murdering the victim, and his children's mental suffering from the defendant's act, and the defendant's motive, circumstance, and circumstances leading up to the crime of this case.