The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, it is justifiable for the lower court to have maintained the judgment of the first instance court that found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In contrast to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on occupational negligence and causal relation in the crime of occupational negligence and negligence.

The Supreme Court precedents, etc. cited in the grounds of appeal are different from the case of this case, and thus it is inappropriate to invoke the case of this case.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.