1. On March 10, 2016, the Defendant filed an application for revocation of the disposition rejecting the reappointment between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor.

1. Details and details of the decision;

A. The Plaintiff is an institution with the authority to appoint a teacher of A University (hereinafter “instant school”).

On March 1, 2010, Defendant Intervenor (hereinafter referred to as “ Intervenor”) entered into a renewal contract with the term of the contract for a foreign full-time faculty member of the instant school on a one-year basis, with a newly appointed one-year term of the contract, and entered into a renewal contract with the term of February 25, 2015 from March 1, 2015 to February 29, 2016.

B. On October 13, 2015, the Plaintiff provided guidance on the expiration of the term of appointment and the application for reappointment to the intervenors, and the Intervenor submitted an application for reappointment to the Plaintiff on October 16, 2015.

C. On November 16, 2015, the Plaintiff held a teachers’ personnel committee (hereinafter “the primary teachers’ personnel committee”) on November 16, 2015, and deliberated on whether to be reappointed (contract) with the teachers whose term of office expires on February 29, 2016, including intervenors, and on November 18, 2015, the Plaintiff was not a re-contract because it failed to meet the standards in the evaluation of the faculty division (department).

D. On December 7, 2015, the Plaintiff submitted a written opinion from the Intervenor, and decided to refuse the Intervenor’s re-election on the grounds that the Intervenor’s explanation was examined, and that there was no reason to change the evaluation scores of the previous faculty (department). On December 24, 2015, the educational foundation C approved the “re-election of the Intervenor’s Faculty member” as requested by the Plaintiff.

E. On December 29, 2015, the Plaintiff notified the intervenors of their refusal to renew the contract (hereinafter “instant rejection disposition”).

On February 24, 2016, the Intervenor filed a petition with the Defendant for revocation of the disposition of refusal to re-appoint the instant case, and the Defendant rendered a decision to revoke the disposition of refusal to re-appoint the instant case (hereinafter “instant decision”).

1. The Plaintiff’s evaluation of faculty (department) shall be a separate requirement for reappointment, and the evaluation of faculty (department) professors shall be conducted.