Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 02:30 on November 21, 2015, in the “C” located in the Sinju-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju-si, that the service was not in mind while drinking together with drinking, he expressed to employees, etc. on the ground that the service was not in mind while drinking together with drinking, and that the police officer E belonging to the Cheongju-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, who called “the problem of the contact loan cannot be resolved by the police officer. In this sense, the issue of the contact loan cannot be resolved by the police officer, regardless of the accusation against the administrative office, and the cell phone cannot be taken out.”

E filming E, E took a defective bath, and booming E’s chest part by hand, thereby obstructing the legitimate performance of duties by police officers in relation to the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of the 112 Reporting List, CCTV photograph-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 136 of the Criminal Act selective punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the fact that the defendant was committed while committing a crime; (b) the degree of assault is minor; (c) the crime committed contingent under the influence of alcohol; (d) there is no record of criminal punishment; (c) the defendant commits the crime against E by police officers; and (d) the receipt of a letter of apology; and (e) other factors for sentencing as prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, shall be