(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2019.11.21 2018가단304617

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2019.11.21 2018가단304617

건물명도(인도)

Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) From 10,159,028 won and September 25, 2019

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition as the basis;

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) is the plaintiff in this case.

The defendant in this case is the defendant in this case. The defendant is divorced.

2. Property division:

A. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) refers to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s real estate indicated in the separate sheet of this case as indicated in the separate sheet of this case.

In relation to the division of property, the transfer of ownership on the ground of the division of property is carried out;

B. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) does not specify the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) as it is irrelevant to the instant case of dump truck.

With respect to the portion of Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant), procedures for registration of transfer of ownership due to division of property shall be implemented, and the principal and interest of the said obligation shall be paid by the obligee of the said obligation on behalf of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) for the principal and interest of the said obligation, which was completed on August 22, 2016 under the receipt of No. 48300 with respect to the real estate indicated in the separate sheet by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

3. The plaintiff shall be designated as a person with parental authority and a custodian of the principal of the case.

4. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) waives the claim for child support and the remainder of the principal claim, and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) waives the claim for consolation money and the remainder of the counterclaim.

5. The total cost of the lawsuit and the cost of mediation shall be borne respectively by each party.

The Plaintiff and the Defendant were legally married couple. From April 10, 2018, in the appellate case (hereinafter “instant family appellate case”), the Chuncheon District Court 2017Reuu16 (principal lawsuit), divorce 2017Reuuu171 (Counterclaim), and consolation money (hereinafter “instant family appellate case”), the conciliation of the following matters (hereinafter “instant conciliation provisions”) was concluded between both parties (hereinafter “instant conciliation”).

- Article 16(1)-

B. As to the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2015.04.03 2014나24220

-부산가정법원 2020.7.23.선고 2020드합200477 판결

-부산가정법원 2016.2.16.선고 2014드단7717 판결

-서울고등법원 2019.09.26 2019나2017957

-부산가정법원 2020.8.20.선고 2018드합201668 판결