A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 11, 2016, the Defendant received a domestic violence report under Article 401 of the building C, a residence of the Defendant located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and received a domestic violence report and received a domestic violence report, and received the Defendant’s control from the slope E, Inspector E, F, and Inspector G about the Defendant’s wife and his father.

B. I want to drink for boom, I assaulted the victim at one time by drinking the part of the police officer G's right to the right.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on occurrence of a case that obstructs the performance of official duties and arrest of a suspect flagrant offender;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the grounds for sentencing favorable to the reasons for sentencing] (the scope of recommendation] under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the grounds for sentencing), the basic area (from June to January 1) of the Act on the Obstruction of the Performance of Official Duties (the prevention of interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) [the decision of sentencing] that there is no person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] of the defendant is against the depth of the defendant, the defendant has no criminal record for the same kind, and the defendant has no other criminal record for the same kind, and the defendant has exceeded the lowest limit of the recommended punishment as the order.