A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On March 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) opened approximately 0.05 g of psychotropic drugs from C, a psychotropic drug, and administered them in a coffee room in the name of the business located near the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon. (hereinafter referred to as “cathophone”).

2. On September 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) received approximately 0.05g philopon from the above C within the scope of No. 507, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, and administered it in the same manner as the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copies of each prosecutor's office and police interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Requests for appraisal -A reproduction;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report;

1. Article 60(1)3 and Articles 4(1) and 2 subparag. 4(b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., Articles 60(1)2 and 4(1) and 2 subparag. 3(2) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., Articles 60(1)2 and 4(1) and 2 subparag. 3(b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., Articles 60(1)2 and 4(1) and 2 subparag. 3(b)

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see the following reasons for sentencing)

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing is that the defendant, who has been punished for a suspended sentence for the same crime even though he/she had been sentenced to a suspended sentence for the crime of the same kind of crime, the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (200 thousand won =

However, since the defendant's husband, who is the husband of the defendant, is detained and under trial, the defendant should raise his child, the defendant confessions the crime of this case and repents his wrong as his name, and the defendant did not repeat again for a considerable period of time, and all the kinds of age, environment, family relationship, etc. of the defendant.