The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

All costs of lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of decision on the petition examination;

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation that operates C University (D University prior to the change of school name in 2012, and C University’s institution or department shall write its name only).

On March 1, 1996, the intervenor was appointed as a full-time lecturer and an associate professor of the Construction Engineering Department through an assistant professor of the Construction Technology Department. On October 1, 2003, the intervenor was promoted to and appointed as an associate professor of the Construction Engineering and the associate professor, and on January 2, 2007, it was changed to the Ministry of Culture and Arts.

B. The plaintiff was unable to make self-help efforts for restructuring as a construction engineering department and a faculty member belonging thereto, whose major was abolished due to the amendment of the school regulations of March 21, 2006, to the intervenor on December 30, 2009.

“The first ex officio dismissal was made on the ground that the intervenor appealed and filed a petition review. On April 26, 2010, the defendant accepted the intervenor’s petition review request and rendered a decision to revoke the first ex officio dismissal. However, the plaintiff appealed and filed a lawsuit to revoke the above decision. On December 29, 2010, the Seoul Administrative Court rendered a decision to dismiss the plaintiff’s request on the ground that the school regulations, which became the basis for major abolition, were null and void on the ground that the school regulations, which were required in the process of enactment and amendment, are serious procedural defects without deliberation by the professors’ conference required in the process of enactment and amendment, and as long as the major abolition is null and void, the first ex officio dismissal disposition is also null and void (No. 2010Guhap3228). The above decision became final and conclusive on January 21, 201. The intervenor filed a lawsuit to revise the principle of trust and good faith to the court and to pay the amount equivalent to wages and consolation money to the intervenor who did not belong to Gwangju High Court.