Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the person who is the owner of the DNAel business in Bupyeong-si C.

On October 20, 2016, the Defendant received 80,000 won in cash from male customers at the above place on October 20, 2016, and provided information to 103, and he was aware of it.

E made phone calls to the telecom, and provided guidance to 103 male guests with a view to arranging sexual traffic with male guests.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each photograph (the defendant's defense counsel at the time of the instant case asserts that the defendant's defense counsel constitutes an illegal undercover operation since the defendant's defense counsel failed to comply with the repeated request of the crackdown police officer.

On the other hand, the investigation method, which simply provides a person with a criminal intent with an opportunity to commit a crime or facilitating a crime, may be permitted depending on the case where it is possible to do so. It cannot be exempt from the illegality of an investigation by an investigative agency inducing a person who does not have the original criminal intent by means of deception or attack, etc., and a prosecution based on such a naval investigation constitutes a case where the procedure is null and void in violation of the law (see Supreme Court Decision 2005Do1247, Oct. 28, 2005, etc.). According to the health stand in this case, G police officers obtained an intelligence that a person with a criminal intent conducts a sexual traffic at the H-day motherel, and finds a woman sexual traffic at the 10th century level, and the above Gel also held a sexual traffic without a thickness, as long as the Defendant had no telephone at this case.

“At the time of calls to a female sexual traffic,” the said G on the day of the instant case, which is followed by the fact that the female called “I will not have any person,” who did not receive the phone, was called “I will not have any person,” and the said G on the day of this case.