logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.08.08 2017고단3541
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[criminal history] The Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating road traffic law in the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court on January 30, 2007, and the summary order of KRW 7 million for the same crime in the Daejeon District Court on May 2, 2012, and the same criminal record is three times.

[Criminal facts] On April 28, 2017, the Defendant driven Bwork-free cars with alcohol content of about 0.082% in alcohol level from around 100 meters to around 421 in the middle unit of the same Gu from the cafeteria at the “Saundong-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Gidong-gu, Gidong-gu.”

As a result, although the defendant had been punished for driving under drinking more than twice, he again driven under drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Previous convictions: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and the text of the judgment attached thereto;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 of the same Act); Article 62 (2) of the same Act does not focus on the main working of the defendant at the time of the crime of this case; it appears that the defendant

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 (1) of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Orders;

arrow