1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 17, 2010, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms, such as booming, booming, selling flaging, and booming, at the Seoul White Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). As a result of the examination conducted by the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff was diagnosed of the brupt 2 to 6 of the brue brusium and the brue brusium.

B. On May 19, 2010, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the Defendant hospital by December 20, 2010, when he/she received crypology surgery (hereinafter “the instant surgery”) from the medical personnel in the Defendant hospital from the 3th century, and from the 4th to 6th in the crypology surgery (hereinafter “the instant surgery”), and at the Defendant hospital, he/she was hospitalized in the instant hospital by December 20, 2010, due to the crypology and reduction of crypology that are not upper on the right side after the instant surgery. However, the Plaintiff complained of more than the crypology and reduction of crypology that are not upper on the right.

(c) The direct damage to the cirical records and the occurrence of a sense of appreciation may be caused by the disorder of the bloodline in the course of an operation, pressure by the blood species after the operation, pressure by the pressure by the blood species after the operation, the cirropic color, etc. caused by the cirical disorder of the bloodline;

In general, additional prescriptions, such as strophy treatment, etc., shall be made when the negonomy damage is caused during the surgery.

In the event of an operation under the Malith Access Act, there are general complications such as infection, pressure of neutism caused by blood species after the operation, direct neutic damage, and Malithic 5th century (it can be accompanied by the movement of leute after the operation), the leutic species, the leutic eutic damage, etc.

[Based on recognition] Gap evidence 1 and Gap evidence 4, the result of this court's entrustment of appraisal of medical records to Seoul Medical Center, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. (1) The Plaintiff’s negligence in the process of the instant surgery, on the ground that the Defendant hospital’s medical team’s negligence in the process of the instant surgery, led to direct damage to the Plaintiff’s piracy by pressure, etc., and thereby, the Plaintiff’s right is not upper.