logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.04.09 2015고단20
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 27, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective action, deadly weapons, etc. causing damage, etc.) caused by damage to the victim’s property by cutting off the wind door of the victim’s Eurgic 14cm and destroying the back glass window of the passenger vehicle, which was located in the latter parking lot of the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Office, Jung-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul Metropolitan City, to the public service center of the Seoul Metropolitan City, for a male relationship of 36 years (n.e., 45 years of age). However, the victim rejected the victim’s request for change of cell phone, but the victim rejected the request. However, the victim’s loss, which is a dangerous thing stored in the DSM7 car (40cm in total length, 34cm in total, 14cm in width in day, 60cm in length, 60cm in length).

2. A violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury by a deadly weapon, etc.) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.) (a collective injury by a deadly weapon, etc.) were committed by the Defendant, around 21:00 on the same day, on the ground that the victim first returned to the Republic of Korea by using his/her own car, and followed the victim. Around 22:04 on the same day, when the victim came to fall short of the 117 sexual market distance to a citizen of Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, and when the vehicle stops in the air by signal signal, the Defendant, a dangerous object, was driven by the said window and the back of the vehicle was 2-3 times.

When the victim continued to turn to the left on the side of the general market, the above EM7 car again received the said window and the car go to the opposite line, and the vehicle go to the opposite line, and go to the central separation zone, and conflict with the victim F F (39 years old) car in the opposite line, which was signaled in the traffic signal at the opposite line, and the vehicle was faced with the Ira car of the victim H driver who was the traffic signal at the central separation zone.

Accordingly, the defendant uses a car in operation, which is a dangerous object, to provide approximately two weeks of treatment to the above C.

arrow