1. As to shares in 2/7 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet:

A. It was concluded on July 2, 2010 between the Defendant and B (C).

1. Basic facts

A. On August 5, 1996, An Anhsung Credit Union loaned KRW 10,00,000 to B at an annual interest rate of 13.5%, due date of repayment of August 7, 1997, and at an annual interest rate of 22%.

On October 13, 2003, Anhsung Credit Union has gone bankrupt, and transferred the above loan claims against the plaintiff (the former trade name before the change: the Reorganization Financial Corporation) to the plaintiff, and around that time, notified the transfer of claims to B.

The Plaintiff filed a suit against B, etc. for the claim for the amount of debt transfer with the Chungcheong District Court Decision 2006 Ghana16359. On August 14, 2006, the Plaintiff received a decision of performance recommendation to the effect that “B shall pay to the Plaintiff 25,097,168 won and 10,000,000 won among them at the rate of 22% per annum from September 1, 2003 to the date of full payment,” and this was finalized on September 1, 2006.

B. Meanwhile, the network D, which was put by B and the Defendant, died on November 9, 2009, and the registration of ownership transfer was made on July 5, 2010 under the name of the Defendant as of November 9, 2009 on the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

C. B, at the time of consultation on the division of inherited property for the instant real estate, there was no particular property in addition to the statutory inheritance for the instant real estate.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3; this Court's Grievance No. 1, 2, and 3; each fact inquiry results against Chungcheong City; and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Defendant asserts that, inasmuch as the agreement on the division of inherited property regarding the instant real estate was made on November 9, 2009 and the revocation of the instant fraudulent act was filed on June 5, 2015, which was five years after the said five-year period, the instant lawsuit was filed against the Defendant for an excessive exclusion period, and thus, it is unlawful.

On November 9, 2009, in the copy of the register of the real estate of this case, the agreement on the division of inherited property was made on November 9, 2009. However, according to the descriptions of evidence Nos. 3 and 4, it is actually networked.