Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle with sod motor vehicle B.

On July 12, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.195% in blood around 23:00, while driving the car, and proceeded at the speed of about 60 km to the long speed of 143 square meters in the south of the wind in the south of the south of high interest city.

At night, its location is a three-distance intersection at the entrance of an intersection where traffic is frequent and there is a stop line at the entrance of an intersection. In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is obliged to perform the duty of care to prevent accidents by entering the intersection after checking whether there is a vehicle entering the intersection prior to entering the intersection and checking whether there is a vehicle entering the intersection prior to entering the intersection, and if there is a vehicle already entering the intersection, by guaranteeing a career safety, such as yield of course for the vehicle, and thereby preventing accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform the above duty of care due to influence of drinking so that it is difficult for the Defendant to drive the motor vehicle normally at the intersection without reducing speed, and due to the occupational negligence of the Defendant’s driving at the right side of the running direction, and entered the road first from the right side of the Defendant’s driving direction and left to the left (5 years old). However, the Defendant was found to have immediately discovered the Drocketing and other motor vehicles driving at the right side of the Defendant’s driving, but the Defendant was able to drive the motor vehicle immediately to avoid collision, and the Defendant was able to take part above the left part of the motor vehicle driving by the victim in front of the left side of the motor vehicle of the victim.

Ultimately, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above business is attributable to the victim E (57) who was on board the top of the instant rocketing car operation, with approximately two weeks of treatment. In short, the Defendant’s injury to the victim E (57) who was on board the said rocketing car operation, due to the above occupational negligence, caused by a face and injection requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.