logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2016.08.17 2016고단101
사기등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months;

However, the above punishment for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

E Farming Partnership is an incorporated farming association established for the purpose of producing and selling fish feed. Defendant A is the representative director of the foregoing legal entity. Defendant B is the husband of H, Defendant C is the director of the E farming association, Defendant C is the director of the E farming association, and Defendant D is the representative of Defendant I.

1. Defendants A, B, C, and D were aware that the farmland cultivation area of the farming association corporation is at least 30 times, and the total amount of the prices of the machinery and equipment used for research fees to be purchased is at least 150 million won, and the victim Gohap-gun was provided with subsidies for the production of research fees of KRW 90 million when they first performed more than KRW 60 million. The fact is that the Defendants, although they did not have the intent or ability to preferentially set up the self-paid charges, did not want to set up a false financial transaction data, etc., they would request subsidies for the production of research fees of KRW 60 million.

On March 11, 2010, the Defendants: (a) transferred KRW 3,00,00 to the account in the name of the E farming association; (b) Defendant A, B, and C transferred the total of KRW 74,57,00,00,00,000 to Defendant D, including the above KRW 333,00,000,00,000,000,000 to Defendant D; and (c) made a financial data as if the E farming association performed first at the E farming association company’s first priority in paying KRW 7,45,00,00,000,000,000 from D operating I; and (d) submitted a written confirmation of the payment of the subsidy; and (c) on March 2010, the Defendants submitted a written confirmation of the payment of the subsidy.

However, the defendant A, the defendant A.

arrow