logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.06.29 2016가단7057
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 13,700,000 as well as 5% per annum from May 1, 2014 to June 29, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The progress of the sales contract for Sejong Special Self-Governing City Criland 1) The Plaintiff is Sejong Special Self-Governing City (hereinafter “ Sejong Special Self-Governing City”).

(2) On November 8, 2013, the sales contract was prepared that the F and two other persons, both F and H, sell an I-source of KRW 4208 square meters to G and H in Sejong City in the name of “E Licensed Real Estate Agent”. The Defendant prepared a contract on behalf of the seller and signed and sealed it in the column of the broker of the contract.

3) In addition, on November 19, 2013, the sales contract was prepared to sell approximately KRW 100,000 among Sejong City L and M to J and K for KRW 220,000,000. The Defendant, on behalf of the seller, prepared a contract on behalf of the seller and signed and sealed it on the broker column of the contract. 4) The Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 4,000,000,000 as the brokerage commission for the sales contract for Sejong City I Institute on December 14, 2013 and December 30, 2013, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 3,00,000 as the broker fee for the sales contract for Sejong City L and M on December 30, 2013. The Defendant paid KRW 300,000,000 as the broker fee for the sales contract for Sejong City L and M on January 22, 2014.

B. On May 28, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Sejong Special Self-Governing City to sell P and Q. Q. 3611 worth KRW 1.8 billion. The contract was arranged by the Plaintiff, but the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the seller without the broker’s agreement. (ii) The Defendant paid part of the remainder on behalf of the buyer. On December 8, 2013, the seller, the Plaintiff, and the Defendant did not pay KRW 20 million to the Plaintiff instead of receiving the remainder amount of KRW 20 million from the Defendant, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 20 million to the Plaintiff instead of receiving the remainder amount of KRW 20 million. The Plaintiff paid KRW 20 million to the Plaintiff on behalf of the Defendant.

. The above.

arrow