logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.06.22 2018고단480
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 12, 2013, the Defendant is a person who had been punished for violating Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on the following grounds: (a) a summary order of KRW 4 million was issued on April 12, 2013 by a fine of KRW 1 million due to a violation of road traffic law in the Gwangju District Court’s net support; and (b) a person who was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the same court on January 29, 2016 by a fine of KRW 3 million for the same offense on the same day.

On February 16, 2018, the Defendant driven C K5 cars under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.184% from the 1km section up to the front road of the Japanese fire station located in the Han River 20,000-ro Mag-ro Mag-ro Mag-ro around February 16, 2018.

2. Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no person of the 2018 Highest 817 shall borrow or lend any access medium in using and managing access medium used for electronic financial transactions.

Nevertheless, on February 2018, the Defendant borrowed the account number and physical card of the passbook for five days as it is necessary for the Defendant to benefit from tax reduction and exemption from D Company. In addition, the Defendant would offer KRW 1.5 million in return.

“On February 8, 2018, at the front of F-ro located in E on February 16:30, 2018, Kwikset service article sent 1 copy of the C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-O-C-C-C-C-C-A-C-C-C-C

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay for the price and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 480"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Previous convictions: Two copies of the inquiry about the results of crackdown on driving alcohol, replys to inquiries, such as criminal history, and output of the summary order “2018 Highest 817”;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. H.

arrow