logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.09.20 2019고단1026
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 2019 Highest 1026;

A. On December 27, 2018, around 21:00, the Defendant was provided with food and beverage equivalent to KRW 32,000,00, total market price of 32,00,000, such as 2 cchills and chills, and chills and chills, even though there was no intent or ability to pay food and beverage under D’s “D” operated by the victim C(43 years of age) on the 1st floor B at Jeju-si. The Defendant was provided with food and beverage equivalent to the same amount.

B. On December 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) on December 28, 2018, the Defendant: (b) instead of having been on the Jeju-si 05:00, the Defendant was committed as if he were to pay the taxi fee even though he had no intent or ability to pay the taxi fee by boarding the taxi of the victim E (the age of 49) as a customer; and (c) had the said victim operate the taxi to the front day of the Jeju-si Gag Do, thereby having the said victim obtain pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 72,700 from the said victim.

On January 6, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 15:55 on January 6, 2019, the Defendant was engaged in the act as if he were to pay the taxi fee even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee by boarding the taxi of the victim H (the age of 50) as a guest in the vicinity of the same sentence; and (b) had the said victim operate the taxi to the front of the 200-40 won from the said victim while having the said victim paid the taxi fee.

Around 03:40 on April 26, 2019, the Defendant: (a) committed as if he were to pay the taxi fee even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee by boarding the taxi operated by the victim J (the age of 64) before the first hotel in Jeju Island; and (b) had the said victim operate the taxi before the Jeju-do, thereby having the said victim acquire the pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 21,500 from the said victim.

B. On February 4, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (i.e., an accident) (i., an accident) driving a Llearning car on the roads near K at the Jeju-si, around February 21, 201.

arrow