A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 10, 2020, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person under whose name the Defendant misrepresented the employee in charge of lending B Bank; and (b) received a proposal from the company to the effect that “The method of lending funds rapidly available is to increase credit rating by depositing the money from the company to the new name passbook; (c) withdrawing the money from the company to the new name passbook and delivering it directly to the company employees; and (d) accepted it and notified the account number of the C account (Account Number D) in the name of the Defendant to the above person under whose name the Defendant was named.”

On March 11, 2020, an employee of the Bosing Organization, who belongs to the above holders of Bosing Organization, made a false statement to the effect that it is possible to improve credit rating if he deposits money into the account that he assumes by telephone to the victim E, and then deposits money to the account that he knows, and that it is possible to make a loan. Accordingly, the employee of the Bosing Organization, on March 11, 2020, transferred KRW 10 million to the above account under the name of the defendant around 12:36, 2020.

On March 11, 2020 to 14:20 on March 11, 2020, the Defendant sent KRW 10 million deposited into the said C account under the name of the Defendant to the person who was designated by the said person under the name of the said person, and then delivered KRW 10 million to the said person who was designated by the said person under the name of the said person under the direction of the said person under the name of the said person under the name of the said person, even though the Defendant was aware of the fact that the lending method proposed by the person who was unable to receive the name was to use the Defendant’s account in order to manage the money illegally acquired by the person who was unable to receive the name due to the experience of lending from financial institutions and lending enterprises.

This is the defendant.